Response from: christopher

I've been enjoying IfEnergy but I have to disagree with voting for Gore. Gore claimed to be an environmentalist while in office, but really could not lay claim to that title. It was only after he left office and the pressures (from a party dominated by business interests though perhaps not as much as the Republicans) that he became someone worth listening to. If he ran for office again, he would have to moderate his calls for true change or be rejected by the Dems. And he does not have enough support to run without party support. So lets encourage Gore to keep up the good fight by doing what he has been doing for the last few years. I would say he has done more good out of office than he did in office.

Response from: Reden

Hello Christopher, thank you for dropping by. I have to agree with you, holding a public position such as president is a tough job because you have to be exactly that, a moderate person always having a moderate position in controversial global issues. I am not from the US but my sentiments are universal. I wish for leaders with balls (pardon the language) the size of watermelons. I hope for decisive leaders who have the capacity to decide beyond party policies. Too idealistic? Yes I would say so too.

Response from: Arizona Quickbooks Payroll (Check me out!)

From Alaska to the Everglades, New Jersey to California, Al Gore talks about being an environmentalist, but he's sold out American citizens, workers, taxpayers and the environment more times than we can count. He sides with clear-cutting timber barons, big sugar, big oil and real estate speculators over forests and watersheds, parks and wildlife. And we lose those fights because when Al Gore sells out, national environmental groups come to his aide, claiming the problem lies somewhere else, with Congress or federal agencies. But we all know the buck stops at the White House."